← all stories

After the Web · Era 4 · Dot-coms and the crash

1997–2005acquired by Yahoo for $1.63B · 2003

Overture Services

GoTo.com

A Pasadena company that from 1998 sold places in search results at auction: a bid per keyword, payment only per click. It grew to $667.7 million in revenue in 2002, but took about 60% of its revenue through Microsoft and Yahoo, and in 2003 it was bought by Yahoo for $1.63 billion.

Founders Bill Gross (Idealab)
Domains goto.com · overture.com
paymentsmarketplacesearch-ads

In brief

From 1998, GoTo.com of Pasadena sold places in search results at auction: the advertiser names a bid for a keyword and pays only for a click. The company grew from $26.8 million in revenue in 1999 to $667.7 million in 2002 and became profitable. But nearly all of its traffic was brought in by other companies' portals and browsers, and in 2003 it was bought by Yahoo for $1.63 billion. Google launched its own pay-per-click auction almost four years after GoTo, in February 2002; Overture's lawsuit ended in a settlement and a license.

How it started (the founders)

The idea belonged to Bill Gross, the founder of the Idealab incubator in Pasadena. The company was incorporated in Delaware on September 15, 1997, and for a while its office was in the building of Idealab, which remained a major shareholder. Gross's own version, as retold by the journalist John Battelle, is that he saw an arbitrage. Ordinary traffic cost 5–10 cents a click, while a person who had typed a word into a search engine himself was worth much more; so places in the results could be sold starting at 1 cent, and partners could be paid less for bringing in users than advertisers were charged estimate.

In February 1998 Gross presented the idea at the TED conference. By one retelling, the audience was puzzled and in places angry; the popular version that the idea was booed is not confirmed by the documents. The service officially launched on June 1, 1998, and a trial version already existed in 1997. The idea went against a habit of the era: search results were considered "honest," and here the top lines were bought. GoTo, according to the account in The History of the Web, answered this with openness: visitors were told that every result on the page had been paid for estimate.

Year-by-year timeline

Lesser-known but significant facts

  1. The patent was filed a year after the launch and fifteen months after the announcement. The application is dated 1999-05-28 and the patent was issued 2001-07-31; Gross is not among its ten inventors. What it protected was a specific mechanism: account, keyword, bid, rank.
  2. About 60% of 2002 revenue came through two partners, Microsoft and Yahoo. Either one could terminate its agreement on a change of ownership. And it was Yahoo that ended up buying Overture.
  3. Traffic acquisition costs paid to partners rose from 56% of revenue in 2001 to 58% in 2002, and the company itself forecast 63–64% for the first quarter of 2003. The company named the reasons itself: prominent sites getting a larger share, competition, and consolidation in the industry.
  4. The minimum bid rose from 1 cent at launch estimate to 10 cents per listing, with a minimum of $20 a month. The average price of a paid click went from $0.20 in 2001 to $0.31 in 2002.
  5. The 2004 settlement closed two disputes, not one. Besides the patent, Google and Yahoo were in dispute over a warrant for 3,719,056 shares under a 2000 agreement; in the amendment to the prospectus of August 18, 2004, the 2.7 million shares are valued at $243 million at the midpoint of the price range, of which Google assigns $195–215 million (in the calculation, $205 million) to a non-cash charge and accounts for the rest as acquired intangible assets; in the August 9 version, with a price range of $108–135, the charge was estimated at $260–290 million.

Legend vs. the record

  1. Google invented pay-per-click. The record: GoTo's pay-for-performance service launched on June 1, 1998, and the patent application was filed on 1999-05-28. AdWords in 2000 charged for impressions, and Google launched pay-per-click on February 20, 2002; in its 2004 prospectus the company itself writes that it launched the cost-per-click model in 2002. Verdict: the legend is false.
  2. GoTo's idea was booed at TED. Retellings differ: some say it was booed, others that the audience was puzzled and in places angry; no primary recording of the talk appears in the sources. Verdict: unproven, estimate; all that is known for certain is that the idea was shown in February 1998 and that the market accepted it through partners, not through the audience in the hall.
  3. Overture lost because its technology was worse. The record: in 2002 revenue was $667.7 million, profit $73.1 million, and the number of advertisers grew from about 53,000 to 80,000. The problem the company itself named among its risks: about 60% of revenue through two partners and the growing share taken by the portals. Its reports contain no argument about the quality of its technology; Google's ranking factored in CTR, while Overture's factored in the bid estimate. Verdict: the main factor was dependence on the distributor, not technology.
  4. Google paid Yahoo 2.7 million shares for the patent. The record: the shares were handed over under an agreement settling two disputes (the patent and the warrant); in return Google received a perpetual license to the patent and related applications. Verdict: half true; only part of the amount was attributable to the patent itself, and the breakdown was not disclosed unverified.

The first growth lever

Growth came not from advertising the service itself but from the partner network: by the fourth quarter of 1999, about 90% of traffic came from partners (browsers and portals). The scheme: GoTo showed its paid results where an audience already existed and shared the revenue. The result over three years: revenue went from $26.8 million (1999) to $103.1 million (2000), $288.1 million (2001), and $667.7 million (2002). The price of that growth was the share handed to partners: 58% of revenue in 2002.

The paired story

The episode "Paid search: who invented it and who made the money" is built on the pairing of Overture and Google (history-google).

Parallels today (projects from the catalog)

What a builder can take from this in 2026

  1. Work out what percentage of your revenue comes from your largest distributor. For Overture it was 60% across two partners, and both agreements could be terminated on a sale. If it is more than a third, that is a risk to your valuation and your independence.
  2. Check whether your partner's share is growing faster than your revenue. Overture's traffic costs grew from 56% to 58% and, by its own forecast, kept rising; the margin goes to whoever owns the audience.
  3. A patent is no substitute for control over the channel. Overture filed suit almost four years after the launch and did not stop Google: the case ended with a license and shares, not an injunction.
  4. Make the paid placement labeled and honest. Open labeling of paid results was, by one retelling, GoTo's answer to the objections of 1998 estimate; today the same question applies to advertising in AI answers.
  5. If you came up with the model but do not own the channel, sell it to whoever does. Yahoo, which had the traffic, paid $1.63 billion for Overture.

Discrepancies and what we could not verify

Sources (primary first)

Internet History Keeper

Every historical dossier here is free and open, and it will stay that way. If you want the series to keep going (new dossiers, checks against primary sources, the English edition), support it with a subscription for $9.90 a month. It is support, not access, and you can cancel at any time.

Become a keeper — $9.90 a month →

The same thing, about today

The same breakdowns, but of projects launching right now: what the product is, where the first users came from, how they charge. The card is free, the full dossier is $5 (the dossier itself is written in Russian).

Browse the dossier catalog →